A good governance or user role assignment means, that a user can determine easily the needed role and get authorization to determined role, if and only if, it is needed for the position which a person is assigned to and in case the request role would lead to any risk or SoD-conflict, then the risk owner approval is provided and a mitigating process controls is placed before the role is assigned to the user.
Do the end users struggle to determine the needed role? Do you simulate potential SoD-Conflicts before assigning the roles to a user? If yes, do you get the approval from the risk owner? And do you place a mitigating process control in advance to check the potential faulty transaction executed after the role assignment and do the process control avoids “false positive”?
Conteliga provides out-of-box process and functionality which check automatically SoD-conflict across different platforms (SAP, non-SAP and legacy System) and informs automatically with a suggestion of mitigating process control to a risk owner in case of a SoD-conflict. The whole IT- process e.g. analysis and simulating
SoD-conflicts, determining the process controls is 100% automated and the business can handle the process themselves. The possibility of automatic approval for the set of roles and user (internal, external, mangers) combination in case on no
SoD-conflicts further reduces the time consumed by the business, which leads to the process time in 90% of role assignment request in zero time, as 90% of role requests are without any SoD-conflicts. This increases user satisfaction and business efficency.